U.S. planning and implementation of post-war transformation in Iraq after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's Government (May 2003 – June 2004)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2025.160.9
Keywords:
U.S. , Iraq, U.S. foreign policy, the Middle East, "debaathification", political historyAbstract
Background. The American invasion of Iraq in 2003 led to significant shifts in the international political landscape of the Middle East and laid the groundwork for a series of protracted conflicts in the region. Following the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime, the United States set out to establish a stable representative government in Iraq and to prevent the country from becoming a safe haven for terrorist groups. This article examines the key strategic decisions made by the George W. Bush administration in the framework of post-war reconstruction. Particular attention is given to the implementation of the concept of nation-building, which faced growing criticism in American society following the perceived failures of the wars in Iraq (2003–2011) and Afghanistan (2001–2021). The findings of this study are significant for understanding the evolution of U.S. foreign policy in the post-bipolar era and are also relevant for Ukraine, which currently receives U.S. support in countering Russian aggression.
Methods. This article is an empirical study based on primary sources. The principal methodological approach employed is the principle of historicism, which requires that past events and phenomena be examined within the context of the specific historical conditions of their emergence and development. The historical-genetic method was used to trace changes in the conceptual foundations of the U.S. government's approach to Iraq's post-war transformation and the means of its implementation.
Results. This study analyzes the evolution of the U.S. approach to Iraq's post-war transformation by examining conceptual frameworks developed during the pre-invasion planning phase and comparing them with the actual policies implemented by the George W. Bush administration. The consequences of key decisions adopted by the U.S. government following the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime are traced and assessed.
Conclusions. Following the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's government in April 2003, Iraq's post-war reconstruction was conducted under the unilateral control of the United States. U.S. policy was implemented through the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), a governmental body within the U.S. Department of Defense. Conceptual planning for Iraq's post-conflict transformation began a year prior to the invasion, primarily under the auspices of the State Department. The political components of the planning emphasized the depoliticization of the Iraqi army and state
bureaucracy to prevent the return of regime loyalists to power. However, the Bush administration radically altered this course by initiating a far more extensive process of purging the state apparatus and military. These actions led to the collapse of Iraq's socio-political structure and increased support for insurgent groups. The United States was unable to suppress the insurgency swiftly due to the limited size of its military contingent – an outcome of the administration's effort to reduce military and financial expenditures.
References
Barton F. D. & Crocker N. B. (2003). A Wiser Peace: An Action Strategy for Post-Conflict Iraq. Center For Strategic & International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/wiser-peace-action-strategy-post-conflict-iraq
Bennet, B (2003). Sorting out the bad from the not so bad. Time. https://time.com/archive/6668730/sorting-the-bad-from-the-not-so-bad/
Bensahel, N.. Oliker, O., Crane, K., Brennan, R. R., Gregg, S. H., Sullivan, T., Rathmell, A. (2008). After Saddam: Prewar Planning and the Occupation of Iraq. RAND Corporation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg642a
Bremer, P. (2003). Iraq's Path to Sovereignty. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2003/09/08/iraqs-path-to-sovereignty/92ccd663-ab69-4a56-b85b-af5f8a5f0baf/
Carney, S. A. (2011). Allied Participation in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Center of Military History.
Coalition Provisional Authority Memorandum Number 1: Implementation Of De-Baathification Order No 1 (2003). GovInfo. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-S-PURL-LPS44858/pdf/GOVPUB-S-PURL-LPS44858.pdf
Coalition Provisional Authority Order Number 1: De-Ba`athification Of Iraqi Society (2003). National Security Archive. https://nsarchive2.gwuedu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB418/docs/9a%20-%20Coalition%20Provisional%20Authority%20Order%20No%201%20-%205-16-03.pdf
Coalition Provisional Authority Order Number 2: Dissolution of Entities (2003). National Security Archive. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB418/docs/9b%20%20Coalition%20Provisional%20Authority%20Order%20No%202%20-%208-23-03.pdf
Defense Policy and Institutions – Working Groups (2002). National Security Archive. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB198/FOI%20Defense%20Policy%20and%20Institutions.pdf
Donnely, T. (2003). Secretary of Stubbornness. American Enterprise Institute. https://www.aei.org/articles/secretary-of-stubbornness/
Future of Iraq – Working Groups (2002). National Security Archive. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB198/20020430.pdf
General George Casey Interview (2014). Miller Center. https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-oral-histories/george-casey-oral-history
Guggenheim, K. (2003). Pentagon Defends Iraq Reconstruction Effort. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2003/05/23/pentagon-defends-iraq-reconstruction-effort/644cdf0c-7562-4314-8530-6033e70f2ef7/
Guidelines When Considering Committing United States Forces (2001). Rumsfeld Library. https://library.rumsfeld.com/doclib/sp/2723/Guidelines%20When%20Considering%20Committing%20U.S.%20Forces%2003-2001.pdf
Hamre, J. J., Barton, F. D., Crocker, N. B., Forman, J. M. & Orr R (2003). Iraq's Post-Conflict Reconstruction - A Field Review and Recommendations. Center For Strategic & International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/iraqs-post-conflict-reconstruction-field-review-and-recommendations
Interview: Lt. Gen. Jay Garner (2003). Frontline. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/yeariniraq/interviews/garner.html
Iraqi Society (2003). GovInfo. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-S-PURL-LPS44094/pdf/GOVPUB-S-PURL-LPS44094.pdf
Maas, P. (2003). The World; Trying to Rebuild Iraq, While Watching Their Backs. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/weekinreview/the-world-trying-to-rebuild-iraq-while-watching-their-backs.html
O’Hanlon, M. E. (2003). Rumsfeld and All the Army’s Men. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/rumsfeld-and-all-the-armys-men/
Otterman S. (2005). Iraq: Debaathification. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/iraq-debaathification#chapter-title-0-5
Rice C. (2011). No Higher Honor. Crown Publishers.
Saghieh, H. (2007). The Life and Death of de-Baathification. L’Irak en perspective, 117–118. https://journals.openedition.org/remmm/3451
Schmitt, E & Brinkley, J. (2003). The Struggle For Iraq: Planning; State Dept. Study Foresaw Trouble Now Plaguing Iraq. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/19/world/struggle-for-iraq-planning-state-dept-study-foresaw-trouble-now-plaguing-iraq.html
Schmitt, E., Brinkley, J. (2003). The Struggle For Iraq: Planning; State Dept. Study Foresaw Trouble Now Plaguing Iraq. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/19/world/struggle-for-iraq-planning-state-dept-study-foresaw-trouble-now-plaguing-iraq.html
Senate Hearings 108-132. Iraq Stabilization And Reconstruction: U.S. Policy And Plans (2003). United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-108shrg89516
Senate Hearings 108-219 - Iraq: Status and Prospects for Reconstruction (2003). United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-108shrg90883/CHRG-108shrg90883
Senate Hearings 108-474. The Nomination of Hon. John D. Negroponte to Be U.S. Ambassador to Iraq (2004). United States Senate Foreign Affairs Committee Hearings. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-108shrg94081/pdf/CHRG-108shrg94081.pdf
Slavin, B. & Moniz, D. (2003). How Peace In Iraq Became So Continued – Violence And Chaos Not Only Jeopardize Troops But Also The Future Of U.S. Foreign Policy In The Middle East. United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-108shrg90883/CHRG-108shrg90883
Transitional Justice – Working Groups (2002). National Security Archive. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB198/20020709.pdf
United States Departament of State information Memorandum. Iraq Contingency planning. (2003). National Security Archive. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB163/iraq-state-03.pdf








