The museum as an instrument of repolonization of Silesia:  creating the image of the recovered territories (1948–1956)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2025.160.12

Authors

Keywords:

Silesia, repolonization, Recovered Territories, State Museum in Wroclaw, Polish People's Republic, Wroclaw, World War II, territorial changes, collective memory, integration, propaganda, historical policy

Abstract

Background. Since its official opening in 1948, just three years after the end of the devastating World War II, the State Museum in Wroclaw has become a cultural center for settlers who have been living in the Recovered Territories – former German territories ceded to Poland as a result of the Potsdam Conference.  
Methods. The study is based on the principle of historicism and objectivity. A set of general scientific methods (synthesis, induction, analysis) and special historical methods (historical and typological method for analyzing the complex of expositions, exhibitions and educational programs of the museum) was used. 
Results. It has been established that the State Museum in Wroclaw played a significant role in the formation and dissemination of the state myth of the Recovered Territories in Poland during 1948–1956. Its expositions, exhibitions and educational programs were aimed at legitimizing territorial changes after the Second World War and integrating the western lands into Poland. The research material collected in this article shows 
that the museum became an important instrument of the government's historical policy, which used it to form national consciousness and patriotic feelings among the population. The arrangement of expositions and exhibitions was carried out in an organized manner, and its activities had a significant impact on the formation of the historical consciousness of the population of the Polish People's Republic.  
Conclusions. The museum exhibitions focused on the Polish character of Silesia, its centuries-old ties with Poland and the indigenous Slavic population. Despite the museum's significant contribution to the integration of the western territories, its activities also bore signs of 
propaganda. Exhibitions often omitted or downplayed the German period in Silesia's history, and historical facts were used to justify state ideology. The museum became an important center of culture for Polish immigrants, helping them to adapt to their new place of residence and integrate into society. In modern Poland, the activities of this museum during the period of the Polish People's Republic are assessed ambiguously. On the one hand, its role in preserving and promoting Polish history and culture is recognized. On the other hand, there is criticism of its propagandistic nature 
and distortion of historical facts. Nevertheless, the museum remains a valuable historical source that allows us to understand how the political regime of the time used historical policy to achieve its goals. 

Author Biography

  • Vsevolod Serhiienko, H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

     PhD Student 

References

dni Wrocławia. (1948). Dziennik Polskę, 6. http://old.mbc.malopolska.pl/ Content/90542/dp_1948_179.pdf

Borówka, T. (2023). Wojownik Słowian. Profesor Józef Kostrzewski i walka polskich archeologów o słowiański Śląsk. Slazag. Pl. https://www.slazag.pl/ wojownik-slowian-profesor-jozef-kostrzewski-i-walka-archeologow-o

slowianski-slask

Dobrosielska, A. (2018). Archeologia "Ziem Odzyskanych". In K. BockMatuszyk, W. Kucharski, P. Zubowski (Eds.) Prusy Wschodnie – dyskurs i praktyki. Na Swoim? U Siebie? Wśród Swoich? Pierwsze Lata Na Ziemiach Zachodnich i Północnych (pp. 445–459).

Dwa nowe muzea otwarło we Wrocławiu. (1948, July 12). Dziennik Zachodni, 2. https://sbc.org.pl/dlibra/publication/504979

Eggert, M. K. H. (2010). Carl Schuchhardt (1858–1943). A Review of Ancient Europe, 51(1/2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.54799/JLJE2028

Kuśnierz-Krupa, D. (2014). Historiozoficzne refleksje z podróży Jana Matejki po miastach Galicji. Journal of Urban Ethnology, 133–147.

https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/show-content/publication/edition/54880?id=54880

Lisevych, I. T. (2008). Kostshevskyi Yuzef. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of History of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]. http://www.history.org.ua/ ?termin=Kostshevskii_Yu

Lukasiewicz, K. (2009). Dagome Iudex and the Frist Conflict Over Succession in Poland. The Polish Institute of Arts and Sciences of America, 4. https://www.academia.edu/14318892/

Muzeum Narodowe we Wrocławiu. (2022). Mnwr. Pl. https://mnwr.pl/ oddzialy/muzeum-narodowe/o-muzeum/

O planowe zwiedzanie WZO. (1948). Dziennik Polskę, 6. http://old.mbc.malopolska.pl/Content/90619/dp_1948_193.pdf

Pacholak, A. (2020). Moment projektowej wolności Wystawa Ziem

Odzyskanych we Wrocławiu w 1948 roku. Historiaposzukaj.Pl.https://www.historiaposzukaj.pl/wiedza,wydarzenia,1445

Prezydent R. P. Otworzył Wystawę Ziem Odzyskanych Z Wrocławia widać drogi przyszłości wytyczaje praca polskich rąk. (1948). Dziennik Polskę, 1. http://old.mbc.malopolska.pl/Content/90647/dp_1948_199.pdf

Sawicki, L. (1948). Działalność Wydziału konserwacji i badań zabytków w terenie w latach 1945–1947. Sprawozdania, 1–61. https://rcin.org.pl/iae/ Content/68830/PDF/WA308_87123_P514_Dzialalnosc-wydzialu_I.pdf

Sidorowicz-Mulak, D. (2021). Ze Lwowa do Wrocławia. Ossolineum w latach 1939–1947. Przystanek historia. Pl. https://www.przystanekhistoria.pl/ pa2/teksty/83494,Ze-Lwowa-do-Wroclawia-Ossolineum-w-latach-19391947.html

Stankiewicz, D. (1978). Konserwacja zbiorów Muzeum Narodowego we Wrocławiu w latach 1948–1978 – wystawa. Ochrona Zabytków, 32.

https://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-fc0452c6653f-475e-ab80-cf990a42bb37/c/Ochrona_Zabytkow-r1979-t32-n2__125153-154.pdf

Talik, M. (2024). Wyjątkowy cykl "Wojna" Artura Grottgera w Muzeum Narodowym. Zobaczcie wstrząsające rysunki. Wroclaw.Pl. https://www.wroclaw.pl/ kultura/artur-grottger-cykl-wojna-rysunki-muzeum-narodowe-wystawa

Tomczyńska, A. (2023). 75-lecie Muzeum Narodowego we Wrocławiu [Dzieje.pl]. Kultura I Sztuka 1945–1989. https://dzieje.pl/dziedzictwo

kulturowe/75-lecie-muzeum-narodowego-we-wroclawiu

Tracz, B. (2023). Druga "repatriacja". Instytutslaski. https://leksykonkresowian. instytutslaski.pl/index.php/Druga_%E2%80%9Erepatriacja%E2%80%9D

Tyszkiewicz, J. (1999). Sto wielkich dni Wrocławia. Wystawa ziem odzyskanych we Wrocławiu a propaganda polityczna ziem zachodnich i

północnych w latach 1945–1948. Besprechungen Und Anzeigen, 47. https://doi.org/10.25627/19994837065

Węcki, M. (2020). I powstanie śląskie (1919 r.) – okoliczności wybuchu. Przystanek historia. Pl. https://przystanekhistoria.pl/pa2/tematy/powstaniaslaskie/72213,I-powstanie-slaskie-1919-r-okolicznosci-wybuchu.html

Wojciechowski, Z. (1945). Polska – Niemcy. Dziesięć wieków zmagania Prace Instytutu zachodniego, 1. https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/libra/ publication/73684/edition/68254/content?ref=L3B1YmxpY2F0aW9uLzczNjk

L2VkaXRpb24vNjgyNjI

Wolność – Zjednoczenie – Odbudowa Ostateczna Unia Ziem Odzyskanych i Polsk i Centralnej. (1948, July 22). Dziennik Polskę, 1.

http://old.mbc.malopolska.pl/Content/90644/dp_1948_198.pdf

Wrocław – największy eksponat. (1948). Dziennik Polskę, 4. http://old.mbc.malopolska.pl/Content/90587/dp_1948_190.pdf

Zachodnia granica Polski granicą pokoju i bezpieczeństwa świata. (1946, July 19). Dziennik Polskę, 2. http://old.mbc.malopolska.pl/Content/ 90638/dp_1948_195.pdf

Published

2025-08-25

How to Cite

The museum as an instrument of repolonization of Silesia:  creating the image of the recovered territories (1948–1956): DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2025.160.12. (2025). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. History, 160(1). https://history.bulletin.knu.ua/article/view/3732