The commemorative scarabs of Amenhotep III as a form of political communication 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2025.161.1

Authors

  • Наталія Bondarenko Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv image/svg+xml

Keywords:

commemorative scarabs, Amenhotep III, political history, legitimization of power, Ancient Egypt, pharaoh, propaganda.

Abstract

Background. This article focuses on the commemorative scarabs of Amenhotep III as a means of political communication and legitimization of power in Ancient Egypt. It examines how the pharaoh used these objects to transmit official information about his achievements, dynastic alliances, and peaceful initiatives, shaping the image of a stable and divine ruler. Scarabs functioned as “news carriers,” allowing the monarchy to control the perception of power among the elite and the wider population.
Methods. The study employs a textual analysis of Ancient Egyptian inscriptions and their translation, prosopographical and comparative-historical analysis, as well as interdisciplinary approaches to assess the symbolic and communicative functions of the scarabs.
Results.
Scarabs recorded key events of the reign, including the marriage to Queen Tiy, lion hunts, the construction of Lake Tiy, and diplomatic alliances. The inscriptions followed a standardized formula: royal titles, description of the event, assessment of the outcome, and summary, transforming historical events into sacred acts that legitimized the pharaoh’s authority and emphasized state stability. They created a network of messages for the elite and foreign partners, highlighting the king’s control over the state and peace.
Conclusions.
Commemorative scarabs functioned as both religious-ideological texts and political messages, reinforcing the image of the pharaoh as a divine ruler. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of material culture as a tool of political communication and propaganda, opening perspectives for interdisciplinary research in the political history of Egypt.

Author Biography

References

Andrews, C. (1994). Amulets of ancient Egypt (Chapter 4: Scarabs for the living and funerary Scarabs, pp. 50–59). University of Texas Press.

Blankenberg-van Delden, C. (1969). The large commemorative scarabs of Amenhotep III. Documenta et Monumenta Orientis Antiqui, 15. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Breasted, J. H. (1906). Ancient records of Egypt: Historical documents from the earliest times to the Persian conquest (Vol. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Clayton, P. (1994). Chronicle of the Pharaohs. London: Thames & Hudson.

Davies, B. G. (1992). Egyptian historical records of the later Eighteenth Dynasty (Fascicle IV). Warminster: Aris & Phillips.

Dodson, A., & Hilton, D. (2004). The complete royal families of ancient Egypt. London: Thames & Hudson.

Fletcher, J. (2000). Chronicle of a Pharaoh: The intimate life of Amenhotep III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kerrigan, M. (2009). Tiy's Wedding Scarab. In The Ancients in Their Own Words (pp. 54–55). Fall River, MA.

Kozloff, A. P., & Bryan, B. M. (1992). Royal and divine statuary in Egypt's dazzling sun: Amenhotep III and his world. Cleveland: The Cleveland Museum of Art.

Kozloff, A. P. (2012). Amenhotep III: Egypt's radiant Pharaoh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leprohon, R. J. (2013). The great name: Ancient Egyptian royal titulary. Atlanta: SBL Press.

Lichtheim, M. (1980). Ancient Egyptian literature: A book of readings: The Late Period. Berkeley: University of California Press.

O’Connor, D. B., & Cline, E. H. (2001). The reign of Amenhotep III: Perspectives on his reign. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Petrie, W. M. F. (1917). Scarabs and cylinders with names: Illustrated by the Egyptian collection in University College, London. London: School of Archaeology in Egypt.

Shaw, I. (2003). The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (New ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tyldesley, J. (2006). Chronicle of the Queens of Egypt. London: Thames & Hudson.

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

The commemorative scarabs of Amenhotep III as a form of political communication : DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2025.161.1. (2026). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. History, 161(2). https://history.bulletin.knu.ua/article/view/4831